Satire: New sport apparently based entirely on kicking a ball – The Arkansas Traveler

Satire: New sport apparently based entirely on kicking a ball

By • October 21st, 2009 • 10:53 am.

Soccer isn't the only sport where kicking is important (<i>Chuck Myers/MCT</i>)

Soccer isn't the only sport where kicking is important (Chuck Myers/MCT)

SWINGING FOR THE FOUL POLE

By Matt Watson

The following story is satirical in nature with fictitious quotes and opinions. It is meant for entertainment purposes only and not to be taken serious. Seriously.

A new sport is making waves in the United States these days, and evidently the basis of the game is just kicking a ball. Unlike other sports popular in the States, “soccer” frowns upon using one’s hands on the ball and instead focuses on the ability to kick said ball in a certain direction beneficial to one’s team.

While soccer has been popular in other countries around the world for some time, the idea of kicking a ball in the right direction for the benefit of one’s teammates is a concept completely foreign to most athletes in the United States.

Soccer is known internationally as “futbol,” not to be confused with American “football,” a popular sport that rarely involves an athlete’s foot coming in contact with the ball. In fact, basketball players and most football players even draw penalties for intentionally using their feet.

Only one player on a soccer team is allowed to use his hands on the ball, and inversely one football player per team is allowed to use his feet. But much like a football team’s kicker, a soccer “goalie” rarely has any significant impact on the outcome of a match or game.

“That’s a really interesting concept,” said Arkansas football coach Bobby Petrino. “It’s hard to imagine that kind of skill translating to anything meaningful in a sport. It’s strange to think a game like football, where 22 guys run from whistle to whistle and hit each other for 60 minutes, would need some kind of kicking contest to determine the better team.”

  • Bryant Virden

    Mr. Watson,

    I have a couple of qualms with this article. First of all, soccer does not have “goalies.” Goalies are in hockey; soccer has goalkeepers. On top of this error, saying that this position “rarely has any significant impact on the outcome of a match or game” clearly shows your lack of knowledge about the sport. I would argue that the goalkeeper is the most important player on the field.

    Maybe these oversights are part of the overall satire of the piece. If this is the case, please disregard my comments.

    Thanks very much.

    - Bryant Virden

  • mwatson

    Mr. Virden,

    Technically, hockey has goaltenders and soccer has goalkeepers, but the term “goalie” is widely used for both. Secondly, I agree that the goalkeeper is the most important player, and I compared goalkeepers to football kickers because the Arkansas kicker was so important in the team’s loss to Florida. I tried to joke that neither player mattered at all, when in fact they often play the biggest roles at the biggest moments in their respective sports.

    Thanks for reading Bryant,

    Matt

  • Ethan

    Just wanted to point out that most of the English-speaking world refers to soccer as “football” or “association football” whereas “futbol” is the word for the sport in Spanish. Also remember that in soccer players run around and hit each other (albeit differently) for 90 minutes, and there are not nearly the substitution allowances. There’s also no requirement to kick the football in American football, especially if you keep your drive going and don’t take dumb penalties.

    Overall, good article though, point well taken, keep it up.

    -Ethan Carter

  • Bryant Virden

    Mr. Watson,

    My sincere apologies for questioning your authoritative sports terminology expertise. It was wrong of me to do so, and I feel very much like a heel. After a closer reading, I see the point you were making about the importance of both goalkeepers and football kickers. The subtlety proved too much for me, I suppose. Again, heel.

    In retrospect, it may not have been in good judgment for me to criticize a newspaper article, especially a humorous one, in the first place. One might get the impression that I’ve nothing better to do.

    Regardless of all of this, keep up the fine work. Your satirical pieces I find to be on par with much of the Onion’s sports section. The levity they supply my week is invaluable. I feel that you have a bright future ahead of you in the news business, young man.

    In actual sincerity,

    Bryant Virden